![]() |
Elect The Lords Campaign for a democratic second chamber |
| Elect The Lords | <info@electthelords.org.uk> |
Today is Lords Reform Day10.21.47am BST (GMT +0100) Fri 10th Aug 2007
Wouldn't it be outrageous if it took Parliament more than 100 years to fulfill its commitment to replace the House of Lords with something democratic? Sadly, that is precisely what may happen. Today marks the 96th anniversary of the Parliament Act 1911 in which Parliament committed itself to replacing the House of Lords with "a Second Chamber constituted on a popular instead of hereditary basis" adding that "such substitution cannot be immediately brought into operation." At the time, you might have thought that would mean the House of Lords would be replaced by a democratic second chamber in 10, maybe 20 years. You would have been forgiven for not thinking that by the turn of the millennium, House of Lords reform would remain incomplete! The GOOD news is that the House of Commons and the Government have now firmly committed themselves to an 80% to 100% elected second chamber. The Commons voted for this in March. The Government confirmed its support for this last month. The House of Lords, perhaps not surprisingly, disagrees. As a result, although it is planning to publish its full plans for reform later this year, the Government is resigned to the fact that reform won't be completed until after the next General Election. We now have just four years before the centenary of the 1911 Parliament Act. At Unlock Democracy, we believe that the Government ought to commit itself to a deadline of holding the first elections to the second chamber by no later than May 2011. That would mean holding them on the same day as the next Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections. Four years from now ought to be long enough to reach agreement, don't you think? If you agree, you can help our campaign by:
Oh, and why not join our Facebook group too (http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2217674797)? Many thanks for your support!
Bookmark this story at:
The views expressed are those of the organisation, not of the service provider. |